Or Atlantic/Pacific ?
RIP*, or prophetic affect ?
(~)
Actually I have pretty much already bookended or bracked this text with notes and hyperlinks. My original inspiration was in the field of geometric religion or practices. The source is a project in The Atlantic(1) and further deconstruction involved that magazine as well.
(~)CAUTION: AS UN- EMBEDDED TO BE KANTINUED [!]
Now for the prospectin' ofor conceptions? Or mining from the lede(or ship):
"The Islamic State is no mere collection of psychopaths. It is a religious group with carefully considered beliefs, among them that it is a key agent of the coming apocalypse. Here’s what that means for its strategy—and for how to stop it."
Now may be just the right time to stop
or wind down my own parsing or~religions~key~apocalypse.*
(~)R,R,R~[!]
* Anachronistic
Reasoning?
^ work in progress(2)[!]
(2) ring E dingy~N.
(~): Scroll Click?
* un circular file ?
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Para~graph Three!
Endo-terror~cism?
aka Academics ?
The point? The esoterics of Strauss maybe the Socratics of Plato, or exoterics of Neitzsche.
Ctrl F (academic:~:academics)
::: aka [a. FOOTNOTE JUNE 2013 PAGE TWO, b. The Daily Counter Balance , c.(J) In the begining... , (D)BoC, e. Belated Breaking News! , f. THE COUNCIL OF NICE , h. Back-Log August 19th, ("religious ghetto") , i.(G).]
::: ? [a. Looking Back , b. "if I were dictator" , c. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! , d. Bane(Or) Change , e. Conservative Foray (4A) , f. Blame to go around? , g. Will Safire Replaced by Will I ams., h. Academic Freedom , i. Framing Narratives , j. In the begining... , k. Technical Difficulties , l. The Thorn and the Lyin' , m. Running Joke , n. Let me finish? , o. We are at the table. , p.Forward (Ironically) ]
(what the fudge? f-j,p?)
::: Endo-suffix?
The project ? The dance?
"Esotericism is the practice, widely employed by a variety of thinkers prior to and up through the early Enlightenment, of disguising their real meaning through ellipsis, surface contradiction, dispersal of their real arguments, and the like (indeed—they were misleading casual readers about their true intentions!). The understanding that philosophers like Plato and Aristotle made use of esotericism was central to Strauss’s own project of returning to their thought as an antidote to what he called the “crisis of modernity”, since it pointed to deeper truths hidden behind the evident meaning extracted by superficial readers. It was probably also one of the sources of distrust of Strauss and his followers by other academics, since it implied that initiates into the art of esoteric interpretation had access to meanings unavailable to others." Francis Fukuyama.
Or Ecto~tonics of Aristotle? Less than Ionic that paranormal came up in English [?]
P.4,The Prince misquote? P.5 "undermine dogmatism" bingo~? P.6 Nietzsche Recurrance
"That latter struggle was ultimately won, and led to the triumph of the “harmonist”view , now almost universally accepted, that philosophical truth could be made compatible with and indeed supportive of modern politics. Transparency is today the name of that venerable game. Classical philosophers like Plato and Aristotle had a different view; namely, that philosophical skepticism undermined the irrational beliefs necessary to the maintenance of a political community and therefore needed to be kept under wraps. As Melzer points out, there is a large body of contemporary scholarship that actively contends that virtually no one other than a few cranks ever wrote esoterically; he performs a great service by, first, showing that the claim is empirically wrong, and second, that it is itself an historically contingent interpretation." (ibid.)
2-25-15 2 ~ B Kantinued ;-) R I P ? [!]
(1) a. Who Let the Dogs Out?, b. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government., c. ...what about the damage to your Presidency?, (d.) The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. Doxology.
(2)~
(3) The Be All and End All?
Pen~ta-gone? i.e. P5
"This section of the book is wonderfully erudite and leaves no uncertainty that esotericism was indeed a major art that is now all but lost. Melzer points to four reasons for past uses of esotericism. First, it served as protection from prosecution; he notes its widespread use in totalitarian countries like the former Soviet Union and contemporary China. Second, it served to protect the political community from dangerous truths, such as philosophical skepticism about the city’s gods and traditions; third, it served a pedagogical purpose by forcing readers to engage on a deeper level; and fourth, it was used as a transitional strategy for modern writers seeking to undermine dogmatism." (ibid)
P6? At this Platonic # I will note Aristotle's place in the Nietzschean struggle.
Hence Fukuyama is a difficult read of Strauss and Plato who are difficult reads.
P7? "If Philosophy Between the Lines were simply a book..." (where P = par.) I might plow on[!]
@9 "Strauss’s central concern was what he called the 'crisis of modernity', where the project of using philosophical reason for practical purposes was in danger of collapse."
@12 "The recovery of the rationalist project was central to Strauss’s life work—"
Having now fully read it, I will let you decide.
aka Academics ?
The point? The esoterics of Strauss maybe the Socratics of Plato, or exoterics of Neitzsche.
Ctrl F (academic:~:academics)
::: aka [a. FOOTNOTE JUNE 2013 PAGE TWO, b. The Daily Counter Balance , c.(J) In the begining... , (D)BoC, e. Belated Breaking News! , f. THE COUNCIL OF NICE , h. Back-Log August 19th, ("religious ghetto") , i.(G).]
::: ? [a. Looking Back , b. "if I were dictator" , c. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! , d. Bane(Or) Change , e. Conservative Foray (4A) , f. Blame to go around? , g. Will Safire Replaced by Will I ams., h. Academic Freedom , i. Framing Narratives , j. In the begining... , k. Technical Difficulties , l. The Thorn and the Lyin' , m. Running Joke , n. Let me finish? , o. We are at the table. , p.Forward (Ironically) ]
(what the fudge? f-j,p?)
::: Endo-suffix?
The project ? The dance?
"Esotericism is the practice, widely employed by a variety of thinkers prior to and up through the early Enlightenment, of disguising their real meaning through ellipsis, surface contradiction, dispersal of their real arguments, and the like (indeed—they were misleading casual readers about their true intentions!). The understanding that philosophers like Plato and Aristotle made use of esotericism was central to Strauss’s own project of returning to their thought as an antidote to what he called the “crisis of modernity”, since it pointed to deeper truths hidden behind the evident meaning extracted by superficial readers. It was probably also one of the sources of distrust of Strauss and his followers by other academics, since it implied that initiates into the art of esoteric interpretation had access to meanings unavailable to others." Francis Fukuyama.
Or Ecto~tonics of Aristotle? Less than Ionic that paranormal came up in English [?]
P.4,The Prince misquote? P.5 "undermine dogmatism" bingo~? P.6 Nietzsche Recurrance
"That latter struggle was ultimately won, and led to the triumph of the “harmonist”
2-25-15 2 ~ B Kantinued ;-) R I P ? [!]
(1) a. Who Let the Dogs Out?, b. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government., c. ...what about the damage to your Presidency?, (d.) The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. Doxology.
(2)~
(3) The Be All and End All?
Pen~ta-gone? i.e. P5
"This section of the book is wonderfully erudite and leaves no uncertainty that esotericism was indeed a major art that is now all but lost. Melzer points to four reasons for past uses of esotericism. First, it served as protection from prosecution; he notes its widespread use in totalitarian countries like the former Soviet Union and contemporary China. Second, it served to protect the political community from dangerous truths, such as philosophical skepticism about the city’s gods and traditions; third, it served a pedagogical purpose by forcing readers to engage on a deeper level; and fourth, it was used as a transitional strategy for modern writers seeking to undermine dogmatism." (ibid)
P6? At this Platonic # I will note Aristotle's place in the Nietzschean struggle.
Hence Fukuyama is a difficult read of Strauss and Plato who are difficult reads.
P7? "If Philosophy Between the Lines were simply a book..." (where P = par.) I might plow on[!]
@9 "Strauss’s central concern was what he called the 'crisis of modernity', where the project of using philosophical reason for practical purposes was in danger of collapse."
@12 "The recovery of the rationalist project was central to Strauss’s life work—"
Having now fully read it, I will let you decide.
Monday, February 23, 2015
Neo-changian?
Naturally Evolving Order !
2-24-15 BIN~GO[!]
A fifth dimention or shun*. See (e,r,s)
C-BIN: Neo-con Pope? Saint maybe, you can't have a dead Pope, but it would be more convenient.
Not to mention RE:cc(card carrying; Nietzsche?) Methane?(~)
(~) wordplay @"BIN" especially :50 mark. Eggs in one hen?
FP here{in one}.
(egg,road, sky: a. FP4 SEPT 2014 , b. Work in Progress , c. Egg/Road/Sky* , d. Speculative Physics )
Self- anomaly
St. Maybe[!] Rooting^ for Strauss[?]
^Pla(N)tonic(~)
* Forward (Ironically) (S~hun~T[!])
???
2-24-15 BIN~GO[!]
A fifth dimention or shun*. See (e,r,s)
C-BIN: Neo-con Pope? Saint maybe, you can't have a dead Pope, but it would be more convenient.
Not to mention RE:cc(card carrying; Nietzsche?) Methane?(~)
(~) wordplay @"BIN" especially :50 mark. Eggs in one hen?
FP here{in one}.
(egg,road, sky: a. FP4 SEPT 2014 , b. Work in Progress , c. Egg/Road/Sky* , d. Speculative Physics )
Self- anomaly
St. Maybe[!] Rooting^ for Strauss[?]
^Pla(N)tonic(~)
* Forward (Ironically) (S~hun~T[!])
???
Friday, February 20, 2015
FP4 (2-20-15) FP$
Dreams.
Un- (sc~hack~led)
:::
De~weavers [!]
Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?
Shilling / Schiller
D(~)image.
( A., Parlay vous?, F'n 8ing[!], The Age of Fed Upism, E.)
Un- (sc~hack~led)
:::
De~weavers [!]
Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?
Shilling / Schiller
D(~)image.
( A., Parlay vous?, F'n 8ing[!], The Age of Fed Upism, E.)
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Friday, February 13, 2015
Bane or Book
Many Republican candidates have book deals in this race.
Here Boehner shows his true colors and we can throw the book at him.
He is known for his tan or orange tint, while No Labels or Bridge candidates range purple.
But on The Ed Show this afternoon we can throw the purple at him.
Batter bather that's anarchist folks[!]
[tangent]
(Rubio, MM)
Here Boehner shows his true colors and we can throw the book at him.
He is known for his tan or orange tint, while No Labels or Bridge candidates range purple.
But on The Ed Show this afternoon we can throw the purple at him.
Batter bather that's anarchist folks[!]
[tangent]
(Rubio, MM)
Economic Summers
What Business Can Do to Save the Middle-Class.
B.S.: P. S.
Straight from Wiki:
Prominent supporters include JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon,[2] Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (although at first she opposed the proposal)[3] and Republican Senator Tom Coburn,[4] Democratic Representative Chris Van Hollen[5] has called for a deal based on the Simpson-Bowles framework. Critics say that it would cut entitlement and safety net programs, includingSocial Security and Medicare . Prominent opponents include Paul Krugman,[6] Republican Vice-Presidential nominee Paul Ryan,[7] President of the Americans for Tax Reform Grover Norquist[8] and Democratic Representative Jan Schakowsky[9]
B.S.: P. S.
Straight from Wiki:
Prominent supporters include JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon,[2] Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (although at first she opposed the proposal)[3] and Republican Senator Tom Coburn,[4] Democratic Representative Chris Van Hollen[5] has called for a deal based on the Simpson-Bowles framework. Critics say that it would cut entitlement and safety net programs, including
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
War Powers Conjugation!
Joint Resolution
Authorization for Use of Military Force
Manichean Reconstitution.
Letter to Congress
If we don't get buy in, we may get sell out.
The fulcrum of* debait and irony woods, or Tiger Irons.
[The Last Word: Phyllis Bennis/ Patrick Murphy]*
*type-O alert
Authorization for Use of Military Force
Manichean Reconstitution.
Letter to Congress
If we don't get buy in, we may get sell out.
The fulcrum of* debait and irony woods, or Tiger Irons.
[The Last Word: Phyllis Bennis/ Patrick Murphy]*
*type-O alert
Jon Stewart Leaving
Monday, February 09, 2015
AM PC
Angela Merkel
Press Conference:
It seemed that President Obama was trying hard, not to use the words "hard work".
Hard work is like the American Dream and Exceptionalism. The likes of Republicans in general, and Bolton and McCain in particular, would prefer to keep them hard work and a dream.
[RF Daily continues subject.]
Press Conference:
It seemed that President Obama was trying hard, not to use the words "hard work".
Hard work is like the American Dream and Exceptionalism. The likes of Republicans in general, and Bolton and McCain in particular, would prefer to keep them hard work and a dream.
[RF Daily continues subject.]
Friday, February 06, 2015
Thursday, February 05, 2015
Wednesday, February 04, 2015
Monday, February 02, 2015
Missed it by that much.
24-28 (**)
Budget may matter. CNBC(4)
Ironies of Empire: Juan Cole
Exclusive w/ Nate Silver
Raw Money Poverty Conversion
Libertarian Hijackers
GOP's Top Hawk(2) by Jim Newell Re: John Bolton - Neo-Manichean[!]*
[Krugman/Dean Economics]
*(Pardon my M-bededness. Italics reference comment and having read.)
** order read (2) .
2-5-15 Re:Pete
Budget may matter. CNBC(4)
Ironies of Empire: Juan Cole
Exclusive w/ Nate Silver
Raw Money Poverty Conversion
Libertarian Hijackers
GOP's Top Hawk(2) by Jim Newell Re: John Bolton - Neo-Manichean[!]*
[Krugman/Dean Economics]
*(Pardon my M-bededness. Italics reference comment and having read.)
** order read (2) .
2-5-15 Re:Pete
Sunday, February 01, 2015
Esoteric Relemma[!]
Waltzing with (Leo)Strauss:** ~(o.p. 2-17-15)
Relemma Revisited
Not exactly.*
* No Teddy
(FP!)
** 2-18-15 Not to pun on Peter, Paul or Pan Rand, but this^^ is a few degrees into(1) acadamia(2).
(1)^ A. SHOCK and AWE(UPDATE) , B. Give 'em a break!
(2) Clash of Civilizations (m-bed'ed in A.)
^ links flip-flopped, re:scroll over alph-click
Speaking of read: Rat Races Van Mices? I am a bit discontent with my reading of Democracy's Discontent.
^^ NFRY That's the ticket [!] Three paragraphs in I need to reboot or check the irony.
[...] not the flack but (~)the flock.(*) (:~:) ?
(*)- need to delineate flack 'n flock
Relemma Revisited
Not exactly.*
* No Teddy
(FP!)
** 2-18-15 Not to pun on Peter, Paul or Pan Rand, but this^^ is a few degrees into(1) acadamia(2).
(1)^ A. SHOCK and AWE(UPDATE) , B. Give 'em a break!
(2) Clash of Civilizations (m-bed'ed in A.)
^ links flip-flopped, re:scroll over alph-click
Speaking of read: Rat Races Van Mices? I am a bit discontent with my reading of Democracy's Discontent.
^^ NFRY That's the ticket [!] Three paragraphs in I need to reboot or check the irony.
[...] not the flack but (~)the flock.(*) (:~:) ?
(*)- need to delineate flack 'n flock
(FP!)
(FP!)(2-11-15)
Fudge!: a. (fp9-12), b. REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!], c. Retro-Gate, d. Weak End Update: Fun'n Edifying,
...
[]
...
The:
Fudge!: a. (fp9-12), b. REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!], c. Retro-Gate, d. Weak End Update: Fun'n Edifying,
...
[]
...
The:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)